In looking at the upcoming congressional election I began to ponder why change is so elusive. This led me to:
Upon further examination and holding a general knowledge of our nation’s government, I propose gerrymandering and being dependent on the dole (personal and corporate) encourages stasis in some of the stagnate House districts. I suspect some districts with large corporations do not want to change their sugar daddy. Likewise, in areas where the rate of public assistance is high, there would be resistance to cut off funding from Uncle Sam. Although, you do see shifts in the elections of 94, 06, 10; however, they seem to be a populous repudiation of the chief executive.